🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.