🔗 Share this article

Throughout the opening pages of the book Authentic, author the author poses a challenge: commonplace directives to “be yourself” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not harmless encouragements for self-expression – they often become snares. Burey’s debut book – a blend of memoir, investigation, cultural commentary and interviews – seeks to unmask how companies appropriate personal identity, shifting the burden of organizational transformation on to staff members who are already vulnerable.

Career Path and Larger Setting

The motivation for the publication originates in part in Burey’s personal work history: different positions across corporate retail, emerging businesses and in worldwide progress, interpreted via her perspective as a Black disabled woman. The two-fold position that Burey faces – a push and pull between standing up for oneself and looking for safety – is the core of Authentic.

It emerges at a time of collective fatigue with organizational empty phrases across America and other regions, as backlash to DEI initiatives mount, and various institutions are scaling back the very frameworks that earlier assured progress and development. The author steps into that landscape to assert that retreating from the language of authenticity – namely, the business jargon that reduces individuality as a set of appearances, quirks and hobbies, keeping workers focused on managing how they are viewed rather than how they are treated – is not an effective response; instead, we need to reinterpret it on our own terms.

Minority Staff and the Display of Identity

Via vivid anecdotes and interviews, the author demonstrates how underrepresented staff – individuals of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, women workers, employees with disabilities – learn early on to modulate which self will “fit in”. A vulnerability becomes a disadvantage and people overcompensate by striving to seem agreeable. The act of “showing your complete identity” becomes a reflective surface on which all manner of anticipations are projected: affective duties, sharing personal information and constant performance of thankfulness. According to Burey, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but without the protections or the trust to survive what comes out.

According to the author, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but without the safeguards or the reliance to endure what comes out.’

Case Study: Jason’s Experience

She illustrates this phenomenon through the narrative of a worker, a employee with hearing loss who chose to teach his colleagues about deaf culture and interaction standards. His willingness to talk about his life – an act of openness the workplace often praises as “sincerity” – for a short time made routine exchanges smoother. But as Burey shows, that progress was fragile. After personnel shifts erased the unofficial understanding Jason had built, the culture of access disappeared. “Everything he taught left with them,” he comments exhaustedly. What was left was the weariness of needing to begin again, of having to take charge for an institution’s learning curve. In Burey’s view, this is what it means to be asked to expose oneself lacking safeguards: to face exposure in a structure that applauds your honesty but refuses to formalize it into policy. Sincerity becomes a trap when organizations count on individual self-disclosure rather than institutional answerability.

Literary Method and Idea of Resistance

Her literary style is at once understandable and expressive. She combines intellectual rigor with a manner of solidarity: an offer for audience to engage, to challenge, to oppose. According to the author, workplace opposition is not loud rebellion but moral resistance – the act of opposing uniformity in environments that require gratitude for basic acceptance. To oppose, from her perspective, is to challenge the stories companies tell about equity and inclusion, and to decline participation in customs that sustain injustice. It may appear as naming bias in a gathering, choosing not to participate of unpaid “equity” effort, or establishing limits around how much of one’s personal life is made available to the organization. Resistance, Burey indicates, is an affirmation of self-respect in settings that often encourage obedience. It constitutes a discipline of honesty rather than defiance, a approach of insisting that one’s humanity is not based on institutional approval.

Redefining Genuineness

The author also avoids rigid dichotomies. Her work does not merely toss out “genuineness” completely: on the contrary, she advocates for its restoration. For Burey, sincerity is not the raw display of character that business environment often celebrates, but a more deliberate correspondence between personal beliefs and one’s actions – an integrity that rejects distortion by corporate expectations. Instead of viewing genuineness as a requirement to overshare or adjust to sanitized ideals of candor, the author encourages audience to maintain the parts of it rooted in truth-telling, self-awareness and moral understanding. According to Burey, the aim is not to discard genuineness but to shift it – to move it out of the boardroom’s performative rituals and toward relationships and workplaces where confidence, fairness and answerability make {